![]() |
Magnolia |
![]() |

Review Copyright Rose Cooper, 2000
To those High Fallutin' Reviewers, I say, next time that pipe goes
around, Just Say No.
Which is to say, that was a weeeird farkin' movie.
Hope That Helps.
The thing that struck me as most interesting about Magnolia
was how, in its jump-cut way (which, along with lead titles such as
"Partly cloudy, 82% chance of rain", itself reminded me of a totally
different flick, Steve Martin's My Blue Heaven. But yet again,
I digress.), it dealt with similar character themes at the same time.
Feeling like a morality play with skits and sketches, it was interesting
to see one character (Earl) at the end stages of his sickness, and another
(Jimmy Gator) at the beginning of his; likewise, has-been ex-Quiz Boy
Donnie Smith could easily provide a mirror image to current Quiz Boy
Rick Spector, a potential has-been himself - unless some Strange Thing
occurs, perhaps?
Throughout the very long (it felt way longer than The Green Mile) movie, we learn something about one character, only
to learn something similar about the next: Linda, Donnie, and Claudia
are Miserable - and here's why; Jim, Stanley, and Phil are Misunderstood - and
here's why; and so on. Yet with all of this learning, we never really
get to know any of the characters. Even at 195 minutes,
there seems to be no time for full character development; perhaps out
of design, or because of the large ensemble cast, there is no real feeling
for the characters, except for Tom "This Is For The Oscar, Y'all!" Cruise's
admittedly good performance as Frank Mackey, a Oprah-gone-radically-wrong,
unattached-sex-is-All hawker who seems to be the embodiment of vengeance
for all those fellas who have grown tired of women who cry "all men
are dawgs!" In Mackey's world, the dawgs rule ("protect the cock...and
pursue the cunt!" is his mantra), and indeed, he is Top Dawg. Only when
a reporter brings him to his knees by bringing up his past, do we see
that he's just a scared little boy behind his cocksure bravada.
Alas, Frank is the only character in whom we are allowed to see some
"real" development, though a couple other characters come close. Most
of the characters were played as one-dimensional to serve their story's
purpose: Earl is Sick, and ever remains so; Phil (Hoffman was terribly
miscast here; his talents could've shined as almost any other character,
but I saw his and the also normally-brilliant William H. Macy's characters,
as being easily exchangeable) is Earl's Helper, on both the physical
and spiritual plane; Linda's role, while nominally more developed than
the other two in their triangle, still amounts to little more than Griefstricken
Near-Widow. It's as if the movie's makers knew it was an ensemble, but
still wanted Cruise's star power to lead them all through the wilderness
come Oscar night.
But - surprise surprise - someone else comes along to steal the show.
Two someones, in fact: John C. Reilly as Officer Jim Kurring (a character
that's very similar to one in a movie that I recently reviewed
but can't quite put my finger on); he'll no doubt be listed as a supporting
character to Cruise, but his portrayal was a centerpiece to this movie,
one that, in my eyes, steered all the other stories to their conclusions.
The second someone was a true supporting character in his arc, but again,
the scenes he was in, belonged to him: Henry Gibson as Thurston
Howell (!), a competitor to Donnie for the attention of a bartender
they both have a thing for. Gibson and Macy seem to be from the same
school of acting, but here, Gibson was the teacher; he Schooled Macy
somethin' fierce. Though Macy is one of my favorite thespians (and a
primary reason for me seeing this flick), I was disappointed by his
acting; I never got the feel for his Donnie, and found him more pathetic
than sympathetic. His scene with the Solomon brothers (Alfred
Molina as Soloman Soloman, Miguel Perez as Avi Solomon), though, was
great; their questioning him about his dental care, had me crackin'
up.
There were many other noteworthy scenes and characters, but I'd be
all day in describing them here. All-in-all, Magnolia is one
of those Experiences that one sees because "everybody's seeing it";
given the right frame of mind (and a nap beforehand, perhaps), it can
be enjoyable enough. As long as you're not particularly picky about
movies having a discernable beginning, middle, and end. Other than that...
First, seeing as it's the start of the new year, I may need to explain
something about the "Black Factor" for those readers joining the program
already in progress: it isn't at all an "anti-White thing", as one reader
complained to me via email (neither, for that fact, is 3BC itself;
we are Black- and female-owned, but not exclusionary. But I digress),
nor do I believe that each and every movie has a politically-Black factor
involved. My noticing things of import to me as a Black viewer is simply
that: my noticing things of import to me as a Black viewer. These things
may or may not strike Black Viewer #2 as all that important, nor will
Black Viewer #2 necessarily agree with my assessment of same. Hence, "We
Are Not A Monolith". Kapeech? Coolness. Now that that's out of
the way...
Strange, said she, that Our representation in Magnolia comes
via three characters: the uncredited Marcy, a big, loud Black woman
who defines the mindset "Crime Makes You Stupid"; Dixon, a young boy
who communicates best by rapping; and Denise (Denise Woolwine), a female
reporter so seemingly unreceptive to Frank Mackey's charms (or he, to
her potential as a - in his words - cunt to be tamed) that he undresses
down to his skivvies in front of her - and she, the safe non-White female,
doesn't even blink.
But maybe that's just me, noticing things.
Rose "Bams" Cooper
Magnolia (1999)
Rated R; running time 195 minutes
Genre: Drama
Seen at: Celebration Cinema (Lansing, Michigan)
Official site: http://www.magnoliamovie.com/
IMDB site: http://us.imdb.com/Details?0175880
Written by: Paul Thomas Anderson
Directed by: Paul Thomas Anderson
Cast: Jason Robards, Julianne Moore, Tom Cruise, Jeremy Blackman, Michael Bowen, William H. Macy, Philip Baker Hall, Melinda Dillon, Melora Walters, John C. Reilly, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Emmanuel Johnson, Henry Gibson, Alfred Molina, Miguel Perez, Denise Woolwine, Luis Guzman, Felicity Huffman
(click here to skip to this movie's rating)
There will be some High Fallutin' Reviewers
that will go on and on about how brilliantly unflawed a piece of art Magnolia
was; about how it totally changed the way they see filumms; about how
they came away with a catharsis that was better'n a good scromp on a hot
summer's day.
THE STORY (WARNING: **spoilers contained below**)
Hellifi know. I'll let this wee bit o' text from the official
Magnolia website do the honors:
THE UPSHOT
Magnolia sets its story up at the start by telling three Tall
Tales - otherwise known as "Urban Legends" (c.f. the "Urban
Legends" website and
"alt.folkore.urban" Usenet newsgroup) - as if they were real ("strange
things happen all the time", the earnest narrator tells us). Having
done so, it almost lost me as a viewer, up until the final act, at which
point, I realized it was all one big Urban Legend [I don't want to
give much away, but it has a wee bit to do with some objects on the
movie poster. And that's all I'm gonna say about that. ribbit.]
Not that having that knowledge made the movie gel as a whole, but it
at least moved it squarely into the "fantasy" genre, thus moving the
Disbelief Suspension Bar up a notch or three. But I find I still
cannot tell you, dear viewer, what Magnolia was about - save redemption,
forgiveness, weird teeth, and the power of a few frogs (well, more than
a few, but I'm just sayin').
THE "BLACK FACTOR"   [ObDisclaimer: We Are Not A Monolith]
BAMMER'S BOTTOM LINE
Greenlight ratings not all being equal, I'll have to swim against the
tide of Highbrow Artflick Reviewers here, even though I'm giving this
one the highest mark we currently have available. Uneven though it were,
Magnolia gets props for Thinking Different ["farkin' weeeeird",
I think I called it], though if you look closely enough at the individual
tales, it's not really all that earth-shatteringly different. Except
for the frogs.
And that's the way I see it.
3BlackChicks Review
Copyright Rose Cooper, 2000
EMAIL: bams@3blackchicks.com   ICQ: 7760005
http://www.3blackchicks.com/
|
More 3BlackChicks review(s) for this week: (movies reviewed week of 1/7/00): |
So, what do you think of this flick, or of the above commentary on it? Fill out the information below to let us know...
Want to share your thoughts and commentary with 3BC and others on this, or any other, show you've seen? Visit our "Viewer Voices" webboard and let all of us hear what you have to say!